Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Injury ; 51(9): 1956-1960, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32522355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) is a lifesaving procedure for select indications in severely injured patients. The main body of the literature stem from regions with a high prevalence of penetrating injuries, while data from European institutions remain scarce. We aimed to evaluate a decade of ERT in a Norwegian trauma centre. METHODS: A prospectively collected series from the institutional trauma registry of all consecutive trauma patients who had an ERT at Stavanger University Hospital (SUH) from 2006 to 2018. Data were extracted using both registry and electronic patient record (EPR) data, including injury profile, demographics and outcomes. Comparison of groups were done by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 26 ERTs were performed during the study period, of which 20 were men (75%) and 6 women (25%). Five patients (19%) survived to hospital discharge, of which 3 men and 2 women with a median age of 46 years (range 24-68). All survivors had thoracic injury as location of major injury (LOMI.). Of the five survivors, four suffered blunt injury and one patient penetrating injury. At one-year of follow-up of the survivors, three patients scored 8/8 on Glasgow outcome scale-extended, 1 patient scored 7/8 and one patient 5/8. CONCLUSION: In this study, ERT conferred good outcome with survival in one of every five procedures. Performing ERT in severely injured patients presenting in extremis appears to be justified even in low-volume centres and in blunt trauma.


Assuntos
Ressuscitação , Traumatismos Torácicos , Toracotomia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Adulto , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirurgia , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Arch Intern Med ; 136(6): 670-7, 1976 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-776110

RESUMO

A retrospective review of 149 patients receiving 162 renal transplants showed that 83% of these patients developed one or more infections during a follow-up period averaging one year. In 32 (73%) of 44 deaths, infection was an important contributing cause. In only four (9%) of the deaths were the patients free of infection at the time of death. The Klebsiella-Enterobacter group was the most common agent causing pneumonitis and sepsis. Cryptococcus neoformans caused seven of 11 cases of meningitis. Pseudomonas was the most frequent agent associated with infections documented during postmortem examinations. In a short-term controlled study comparing daily and alternate daily therapy with prednisone, the alternate daily group had significantly (P less than .05) more infections per patient, especially in patients who had no evidence of rejection (P less than .025).


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Transplante de Rim , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Azatioprina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/mortalidade , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão , Masculino , Michigan , Prednisona/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...